IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Witt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 30 0 6 6 0.200 0.0578 0.0578 0.1506 0.1506
2020-21 — SJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0963 0.0963 0.2509 0.2509
2021-22 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 57 6 21 27 0.474 0.1369 0.1298 0.3566 0.3381
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 26 1 9 10 0.385
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 0 5 5 0.200
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 22 1 7 8 0.364
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Albertus Magnus
+63.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14390
Defenseman overall
#1899
Defenseman born in 2001
#1834
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Watson
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McQuade
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Williams
Marian · 2007-08
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.