← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Cole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 48 23 38 61 1.271 0.2756 0.2780 0.9832 0.9919
2019-20 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 32 9 22 31 0.969 0.2101 0.2101 0.7496 0.7496
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 20 6 17 23 1.150 0.3857 0.3857 1.0642 1.0642
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 36 8 12 20 0.556
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 36 10 7 17 0.472
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 33 6 8 14 0.424
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 22 3 7 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2021-22 · UMass Lowell
+91.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11264
Forward overall
#475
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.