IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dario Beljo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 8 2 4 6 0.750 0.2488 0.2488 0.6951 0.6951
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 58 28 29 57 0.983 0.3261 0.3214 0.9109 0.8978
2022-23 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 34 55 89 1.483 0.4922 0.4607 1.3747 1.2868
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2024-25 American International D1 AHA — 30 11 9 20 0.667
2023-24 American International D1 AHA — 16 2 4 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · American International
+8.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7788
Forward overall
#361
Forward born in 2002
#81
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Williams
Curry · 2007-08
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Audette
Becker · 2018-19
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.