IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominick Campione Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 18 1 5 6 0.333 0.1118 0.1118 0.3084 0.3084
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 47 6 18 24 0.511 0.1713 0.1712 0.4725 0.4723
2022-23 Brooks Bandits AJHL 57 4 16 20 0.351 0.1177 0.1118 0.3247 0.3085
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA JR 33 1 4 5 0.151
2024-25 Stonehill D1 AHA — 31 3 10 13 0.419
2023-24 Stonehill D1 AHA — 24 3 4 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Stonehill
+127.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12804
Defenseman overall
#2515
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Van Tassel
Hamline · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.