← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trenton Curtis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 13 5 0 5 0.385 0.1290 0.1290 0.3559 0.3559
2021-22 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 46 12 29 41 0.891 0.2284 0.2223 0.6719 0.6538
2022-23 SJHL 54 16 28 44 0.815 0.2088 0.1928 0.6142 0.5670
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538
2024-25 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538
2023-24 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538
2022-23 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538
2021-22 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538
2020-21 Minot State University ACHA_D1 13 5 2 7 0.538

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24292
Forward overall
#1350
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.