IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Moshurchak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 43 4 6 10 0.233 0.0780 0.0796 0.2156 0.2200
2022-23 — AJHL 38 0 3 3 0.079 0.0265 0.0257 0.0731 0.0710
2023-24 — AJHL 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0268 0.0248 0.0741 0.0685
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 24 0 1 1 0.042
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 18 0 1 1 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2024-25 · Canton
+133.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28252
Defenseman overall
#4230
Defenseman born in 2003
#2842
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Perron
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Perry
Becker · 2016-17
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.