IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Traggio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.0578 0.0578 0.1329 0.1329
2019-20 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 26 3 12 15 0.577 0.1143 0.1143 0.2628 0.2628
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 12 0 4 4 0.333 0.1359 0.1359 — —
2021-22 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 51 7 26 33 0.647 0.2170 0.2026 0.5988 0.5591
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SR 29 0 2 2 0.069
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 26 3 1 4 0.154
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6879
Defenseman overall
#1480
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zeke Hume
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2017-18
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.