IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel D'Alessandro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-28 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 35 5 13 18 0.514 0.1982 0.2009 0.7485 0.7585
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 28 2 7 9 0.321 0.1896 0.1779 0.9653 0.9058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6332
Defenseman overall
#1346
Defenseman born in 2006
#2585
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Bergeman
University of New England · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver De Croock
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2014-15
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.