IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 57 14 20 34 0.597 0.1979 0.2063 0.5528 0.5762
2022-23 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 27 6 6 12 0.444 0.1475 0.1464 0.4119 0.4090
2023-24 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 55 47 41 88 1.600 0.4874 0.4676 1.1858 1.1376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 32 3 1 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · St. Lawrence
-56.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14674
Forward overall
#712
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Malkmus
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Bengtson
New England · 2014-15
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.