← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxson Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1805 0.4634 0.4988
2022-23 AJHL 44 3 4 7 0.159 0.0534 0.0548 0.1475 0.1515
2023-24 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 52 3 8 11 0.211 0.0542 0.0538 0.1567 0.1557
2024-25 Devon Xtreme AJHL 54 1 8 9 0.167 0.0559 0.0518 0.1545 0.1432
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC 18 0 1 1 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Albertus Magnus
+11.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24531
Defenseman overall
#3959
Defenseman born in 2004
#2588
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.