IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Abbott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 1 0 1 0.038 0.0074 0.0074 0.0176 0.0176
2021-22 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.0563 0.0563 0.1335 0.1335
2022-23 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 53 14 25 39 0.736 0.2468 0.2471 0.6819 0.6826
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 26 4 12 16 0.615
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 24 3 8 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2023-24 · Bowdoin
+184.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11721
Defenseman overall
#2398
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.