IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Cataldo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 60 15 21 36 0.600 0.1991 0.1935 0.5561 0.5405
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC — 31 3 4 7 0.226
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 28 1 2 3 0.107
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 26 2 1 3 0.115
2001-02 Assumption D2 — SO 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28325
Forward overall
#1627
Forward born in 2003
#1057
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Stratton
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Moher
Amherst · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Arcan
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.