IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sascha Boumedienne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-17 Country: Sweden
2025 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #28  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 49 3 24 27 0.551 0.3387 0.3679 1.6234 1.7632
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast SO 35 2 8 10 0.286
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 40 3 10 13 0.325
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Boston University
-6.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2423
Defenseman overall
#327
Defenseman born in 2007
#1210
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mark Friedman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Glover
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.