IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Eliav Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Elite 37 11 28 39 1.054 0.0785 0.0835 0.2415 0.2569
2022-23 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 43 1 16 17 0.395 0.0446 0.0472 0.1345 0.1424
2023-24 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 30 14 16 30 1.000 0.1128 0.1140 0.3402 0.3438
2024-25 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 30 4 11 15 0.500 0.1677 0.1589 0.4634 0.4391
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC — 27 4 4 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · Neumann
+122.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6775
Defenseman overall
#1667
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.