← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Morin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-25 Country: Canada
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.2076 0.2257 1.0569 1.1491
2024-25 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 56 16 20 36 0.643 0.3159 0.3287 1.7167 1.7864
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 63 17 17 34 0.540 0.2652 0.2634 1.4412 1.4316
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19109
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.13
actual FR PPG at Boston University
BCHL 2016-17
0.25
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2023-24
0.27
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2014-15
0.28
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.