IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Gorton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 25 3 14 17 0.680 0.1918 0.1918 0.3112 0.3112
2020-21 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 6 5 1 6 1.000 0.2821 0.2821 0.4576 0.4576
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 9 19 28 0.528 0.1968 0.1891 0.7698 0.7396
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 17 28 45 0.833 0.3104 0.2830 1.2142 1.1070
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC JR 12 2 0 2 0.167
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21494
Forward overall
#1172
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jayson Alegria
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.