IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donato Bracco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 5 30 35 0.648 0.5025 0.5204 2.4122 2.4981
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 66 5 27 32 0.485 0.3759 0.3716 1.8044 1.7838
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 28 1 1 2 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2025-26 · Harvard
-82.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2032
Defenseman overall
#253
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Neal Pionk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Brodzinski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.