IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Trethewey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-02 Country: USA
2025 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #73  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NTDP-U18 52 12 23 35 0.673 0.5219 0.5410 2.5052 2.5968
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 63 6 14 20 0.318 0.2462 0.2436 1.1817 1.1694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast FR 34 1 9 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Boston University
-14.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4637
Defenseman overall
#690
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Neal Pionk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.