IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Edison Engle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-15 Country: USA
2025 · Round 6, Pick #188  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 33 1 11 12 0.364 0.2145 0.2338 1.0920 1.1904
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 54 2 15 17 0.315 0.1857 0.1930 0.9455 0.9824
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 61 3 25 28 0.459 0.2655 0.2623 1.1794 1.1650
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5183
Defenseman overall
#745
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Aidan Fulp
USHL 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Jacob Bauer
USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Zack Sharp
USHL 2023-24
0.21
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Caden Triggs
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.