IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Jardine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-23 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 12 7 4 11 0.917 0.5838 0.6564 2.7471 3.0886
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 62 20 24 44 0.710 0.4519 0.4850 2.1268 2.2826
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 53 27 34 61 1.151 0.7329 0.7512 3.4489 3.5351
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1243
Forward overall
#31
Forward born in 2007
#147
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.79 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.72 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Kile
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Landen Gunderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Jake Wise
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.80
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Tanner Laczynski
USHL 2015-16
0.94
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Matthew Weis
USHL 2013-14
0.67
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.