IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brennan Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-12-05 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 5, Pick #134  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 35 2 8 10 0.286 0.0732 0.0815 0.2154 0.2399
2004-05 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 41 5 12 17 0.415 0.1062 0.1131 0.3125 0.3327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Yale D1 ECAC JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2006-07 Yale D1 ECAC SO 27 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Yale D1 ECAC FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2005-06 · Yale
+31.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15560
Defenseman overall
#1456
Defenseman born in 1986
#1295
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Stevens
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bondra
Amherst · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.