← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Lindberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-08 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Little Falls USHS-MN 27 2 1 3 0.111 0.0141 0.0141 0.0270 0.0270
2022-23 Little Falls USHS-MN 27 3 9 12 0.444 0.0563 0.0563 0.1079 0.1079
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 1 9 10 0.185 0.1377 0.1400 0.6911 0.7024
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 61 2 11 13 0.213 0.1584 0.1536 0.7952 0.7709
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 57 6 18 24 0.421 0.2484 0.2468 1.2647 1.2567
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8830
Defenseman overall
#1226
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.47
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
BCHL 2019-20
0.28
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2015-16
0.10
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
NAHL 2014-15
0.09
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.