← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-12 Country: USA
Arcadia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 3 0 3 3 1.000 0.3674 0.3980 1.0555 1.1434
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 47 7 15 22 0.468 0.1720 0.1773 0.4941 0.5093
2015-16 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 9 13 22 0.367 0.2163 0.2060 1.1013 1.0488
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 16 1 0 1 0.062
2018-19 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 31 2 1 3 0.097
2017-18 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 27 1 5 6 0.222
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 32 0 3 3 0.094
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2016-17 · North Dakota
-48.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6290
Defenseman overall
#1108
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Arcadia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.92
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.65
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.59
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.54
actual FR PPG at Arcadia

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.