IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Morton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-09-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.0809 0.0855 0.2381 0.2517
2006-07 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 57 22 24 46 0.807 0.2068 0.2077 0.6083 0.6109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 26 10 15 25 0.962
2009-10 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 26 15 21 36 1.385
2008-09 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 24 5 10 15 0.625
2007-08 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 25 4 8 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2007-08 · Fredonia
+253.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30886
Forward overall
#993
Forward born in 1987
#616
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Waring
Endicott · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Rickett
Norwich · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kayser Raei
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.