IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reave MacKinnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.1925 0.2080 0.6306 0.6815
2005-06 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 15 1 2 3 0.200 0.0385 0.0396 0.1261 0.1298
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 10 1 3 4 0.400 0.0770 0.0756 0.2522 0.2477
2007-08 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 62 31 56 87 1.403 0.2701 0.2508 0.8849 0.8216
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 St. Michael's College D2 — JR 26 18 19 37 1.423
2009-10 St. Michael's College D2 — SO 26 13 11 24 0.923
2008-09 St. Michael's College D2 — FR 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2008-09 · St. Michael's College
+74.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25391
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 1987
#305
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Becker
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.