IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reave MacKinnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2719 0.2938 0.6302 0.6811
2005-06 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 15 1 2 3 0.200 0.0544 0.0560 0.1260 0.1297
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 10 1 3 4 0.400 0.1088 0.1069 0.2521 0.2476
2007-08 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 62 31 56 87 1.403 0.3815 0.3542 0.8843 0.8210
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 St. Michael's College D2 — JR 26 18 19 37 1.423
2009-10 St. Michael's College D2 — SO 26 13 11 24 0.923
2008-09 St. Michael's College D2 — FR 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2008-09 · St. Michael's College
+23.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25137
Forward overall
#801
Forward born in 1987
#396
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.