← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Tournas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 41 2 3 5 0.122 0.0720 0.0749 0.3661 0.3809
2024-25 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 56 39 35 74 1.321 0.4855 0.5017 1.3966 1.4433
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 64 43 31 74 1.156 0.5680 0.5376 3.0866 2.9216
2026-27 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 7 8 1 9 1.286 0.6317 0.6317 3.4323 3.4323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7623
Forward overall
#221
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OHL 2016-17
0.47
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
QMJHL 2024-25
0.40
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
QMJHL 2024-25
0.31
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USHL 2020-21
0.40
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.