IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Mather Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Nepean Raiders CCHL 53 9 18 27 0.509 0.1454 0.1605 0.3943 0.4352
2004-05 Nepean Raiders CCHL 52 21 37 58 1.115 0.3183 0.3374 0.8634 0.9152
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 18 25 43 0.741 0.2116 0.2149 0.5739 0.5830
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 37 19 18 37 1.000 0.2854 0.2758 0.7741 0.7481
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 57 28 43 71 1.246 0.3555 0.3265 0.9642 0.8855
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 23 3 7 10 0.435
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 27 8 20 28 1.037
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 22 6 3 9 0.409
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 13 3 1 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2008-09 · SUNY Oswego
+17.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10424
Forward overall
#437
Forward born in 1987
#168
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.