IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Jordan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Melville Millionaires SJHL 52 6 6 12 0.231 0.0591 0.0644 0.1737 0.1894
2007-08 Melville Millionaires SJHL 55 4 10 14 0.255 0.0652 0.0677 0.1915 0.1988
2008-09 Melville Millionaires SJHL 56 11 15 26 0.464 0.1190 0.1176 0.3493 0.3452
2009-10 Melville Millionaires SJHL 57 20 26 46 0.807 0.2068 0.1949 0.6072 0.5722
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 15 0 1 1 0.067

NCAAe Rankings

#32464
Forward overall
#1080
Forward born in 1989
#671
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.