← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Stuart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-08 Country: USA
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 37 4 2 6 0.162 0.1206 0.1216 0.6052 0.6103
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 45 11 9 20 0.444 0.3303 0.3175 1.6582 1.5941
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 6 10 16 0.314 0.1851 0.1824 0.9422 0.9286
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19400
Forward overall
#575
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.35
actual FR PPG at Denver
NAHL 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2001-02
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.