← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryder Betzold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-31 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0101 0.0101 0.0194 0.0194
2022-23 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 27 19 12 31 1.148 0.1453 0.1453 0.2789 0.2789
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 5 1 2 3 0.600 0.3539 0.3879 1.8020 1.9752
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0610 0.0637 0.3106 0.3246
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 61 15 27 42 0.689 0.4061 0.4048 2.0678 2.0612
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14238
Forward overall
#392
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2018-19
0.57
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2012-13
0.21
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2016-17
0.40
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.