← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Atkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brockville Braves CCHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0434 0.0479 0.1548 0.1710
2004-05 Brockville Braves CCHL 28 1 0 1 0.036 0.0077 0.0082 0.0276 0.0293
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 50 9 14 23 0.460 0.0998 0.1014 0.3561 0.3619
2006-07 Brockville Braves CCHL 55 2 13 15 0.273 0.0591 0.0571 0.2111 0.2041
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 7 17 24 0.462 0.1001 0.0920 0.3572 0.3282
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 27 2 23 25 0.926
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 27 2 16 18 0.667
2009-10 Castleton D3 SO 25 4 6 10 0.400
2008-09 Castleton D3 FR 24 0 9 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2008-09 · Castleton
+408.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13075
Defenseman overall
#1324
Defenseman born in 1987
#1119
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.