IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 31 2 3 5 0.161 0.0413 0.0430 0.1195 0.1244
2008-09 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 43 4 6 10 0.233 0.0596 0.0590 0.1724 0.1708
2009-10 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 54 10 9 19 0.352 0.0902 0.0852 0.2608 0.2464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 — SR 28 1 5 6 0.214
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 — JR 23 2 0 2 0.087
2011-12 St. Thomas D3 — SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2010-11 St. Thomas D3 — FR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2010-11 · St. Thomas
+171.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50406
Forward overall
#1689
Forward born in 1989
#1680
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Pichler
Castleton · 2009-10
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kegan Couture
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trace Strahle
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.