← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kegan Couture Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 44 14 39 53 1.204 0.1512 0.1486 0.3803 0.3738
2015-16 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 47 28 48 76 1.617 0.2029 0.1895 0.5105 0.4769
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 9 1 0 1 0.111
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 13 0 2 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2016-17 · Gustavus Adolphus
+3.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13385
Forward overall
#532
Forward born in 1995
#160
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.