IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Lazorko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Winkler Flyers MJHL 61 30 26 56 0.918 0.1767 0.1814 0.5785 0.5938
2008-09 Winkler Flyers MJHL 62 54 49 103 1.661 0.3198 0.3124 1.0470 1.0229
2009-10 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 25 35 60 1.017 0.1958 0.1825 0.6409 0.5975
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast GR 10 4 7 11 1.100
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 23 17 40 1.538
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 24 9 7 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Castleton
+232.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13388
Forward overall
#463
Forward born in 1989
#70
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Way
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Roepke
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.