IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Salituro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2794 0.3111 0.6901 0.7683
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 15 2 7 9 0.600 0.1676 0.1790 0.4141 0.4423
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 51 15 23 38 0.745 0.2082 0.2117 0.5142 0.5229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 26 14 17 31 1.192
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 11 15 26 0.963
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 25 9 6 15 0.600
2009-10 Hobart D3 — FR 11 2 0 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2009-10 · Hobart
+6.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21294
Forward overall
#892
Forward born in 1990
#1641
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Vosejpka
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Air Force (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jacob Hetz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Smietana
Fredonia · 2000-01
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Clark Kerner
Norwich · 2018-19
1.217 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Schultz
Lebanon Valley · 2000-01
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.