IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Salituro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2451 0.2729 0.6885 0.7666
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 15 2 7 9 0.600 0.1471 0.1571 0.4131 0.4412
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 51 15 23 38 0.745 0.1826 0.1857 0.5130 0.5216
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 26 14 17 31 1.192
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 11 15 26 0.963
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 25 9 6 15 0.600
2009-10 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 11 2 0 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2009-10 · Hobart
+21.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27514
Forward overall
#1010
Forward born in 1990
#1345
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Roberts
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnathon Mead
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Smietana
Fredonia · 2000-01
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.