IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Jarvis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-11-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 46 9 25 34 0.739 0.1812 0.1688 0.5089 0.4740
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC GR 25 5 10 15 0.600
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 1 14 15 0.600
2010-11 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 5 10 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · SUNY Morrisville
+292.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5734
Defenseman overall
#842
Defenseman born in 1989
#1153
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eliot Grauer
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Amaya
Aurora · 2016-17
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Williams
Concordia · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.