← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-28 Country: Canada
2006 · Round 3, Pick #66  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Ottawa 67's OHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0764 0.3212 0.3393
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 34 3 10 13 0.382 0.2212 0.2225 0.9826 0.9886
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8502
Defenseman overall
#1183
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.16
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at Providence
BCHL 2016-17
0.09
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.