← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-28 Country: Canada
2006 · Round 3, Pick #66  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Ottawa 67's OHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0764 0.3273 0.3457
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 34 3 10 13 0.382 0.2212 0.2225 1.0013 1.0074
2026-27 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.2106 0.2106 1.1442 1.1442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8624
Defenseman overall
#1227
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
NAHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2024-25
0.16
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.