IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Baum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 40 3 15 18 0.450 0.1040 0.1141 0.2202 0.2416
2014-15 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 24 1 3 4 0.167 0.0612 0.0636 0.1760 0.1830
2015-16 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 57 10 20 30 0.526 0.1934 0.1926 0.5555 0.5531
2016-17 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 2 10 12 0.207 0.1221 0.1112 0.6214 0.5657
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 American International D1 AHA SR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2019-20 American International D1 AHA JR 32 2 5 7 0.219
2018-19 American International D1 AHA SO 26 1 3 4 0.154
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11801
Defenseman overall
#1690
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Van Dyk
Castleton · 2010-11
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Ayers
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.