IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian DePasquale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Villanova Knights OJHL 55 6 21 27 0.491 0.1203 0.1133 0.3360 0.3164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2012-13 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 22 6 6 12 0.545
2011-12 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 25 7 13 20 0.800
2010-11 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 26 4 9 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2010-11 · Johnson & Wales
+415.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37036
Forward overall
#1341
Forward born in 1990
#2266
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Petr Staif
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kienan Scott
Colby · 2015-16
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bloem
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.