← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Bowles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 61 7 4 11 0.180 0.0347 0.0374 0.1136 0.1225
2006-07 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 61 13 27 40 0.656 0.1262 0.1302 0.4132 0.4262
2007-08 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 35 66 101 1.629 0.3136 0.3066 1.0266 1.0036
2008-09 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 53 27 52 79 1.491 0.2869 0.2663 0.9394 0.8719
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 28 7 11 18 0.643
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 JR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 SO 22 4 7 11 0.500
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 FR 20 1 4 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2009-10 · Manhattanville
+3.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10659
Forward overall
#408
Forward born in 1988
#38
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.