IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Krayer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-12 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 33 11 5 16 0.485 0.1868 0.1997 — —
2025-26 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 23 40 63 1.167 0.4495 0.4641 1.6968 1.7520
2026-27 Tri-City Storm USHL 6 2 5 7 1.167 0.6882 0.6882 3.5009 3.5009
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13817
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 2007
#1457
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Stenglein
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Beck
OHL 2022-23
0.80
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Jack Jensen
USHL 2020-21
0.44
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Logan Jenuwine
NAHL 2018-19
0.40
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Josh Doan
USHL 2020-21
1.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.