IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wes Consorti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 49 31 32 63 1.286 0.3151 0.3396 0.8801 0.9485
2007-08 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 44 29 44 73 1.659 0.4066 0.4198 1.1357 1.1727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Elmira D3 — SO 24 8 4 12 0.500
2010-11 Elmira D3 — FR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2009-10 Niagara D1 AHA SO 17 2 3 5 0.294
2008-09 Niagara D1 AHA FR 32 2 7 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2008-09 · Niagara
-15.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6797
Forward overall
#242
Forward born in 1989
#58
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.