IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 16 27 43 0.754 0.2153 0.2200 0.5840 0.5968
2006-07 — CCHL 50 19 24 43 0.860 0.2454 0.2387 0.6657 0.6474
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 14 41 55 0.932 0.2660 0.2459 0.7216 0.6671
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 27 3 5 8 0.296
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 4 8 12 0.462
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
2007-08 Suffolk D3 — SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2006-07 Suffolk D3 — FR 12 1 0 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2006-07 · Suffolk
-55.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14792
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 1987
#362
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Larry Jungwirth
Aurora · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Olivieri
Utica · 2011-12
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.