IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Haaf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 37 1 3 4 0.108 0.0277 0.0293 0.0815 0.0862
2011-12 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 57 7 13 20 0.351 0.0899 0.0902 0.2645 0.2654
2012-13 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 57 16 29 45 0.789 0.1520 0.1448 0.4979 0.4744
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 3 10 13 0.520
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA — 25 3 10 13 0.520
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC — 24 3 7 10 0.417
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA — 24 3 7 10 0.417
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA — 12 0 2 2 0.167
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA — 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2013-14 · Adrian
-33.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11968
Defenseman overall
#1468
Defenseman born in 1992
#991
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Parshall
King's · 2023-24
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Newcomer
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Spencer
Trinity · 2024-25
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.