IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dillon Schwartzenberger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.1490 0.1531 0.4374 0.4495
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 34 8 14 22 0.647 0.1658 0.1630 0.4869 0.4787
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 47 14 25 39 0.830 0.2126 0.1978 0.6243 0.5808
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2014-15 · Concordia
-13.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25606
Forward overall
#886
Forward born in 1993
#395
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vick Schlueter
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.