IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Grandinetti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 54 0 4 4 0.074 0.0161 0.0166 0.0574 0.0592
2007-08 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 58 0 19 19 0.328 0.0711 0.0699 0.2536 0.2493
2008-09 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 60 6 17 23 0.383 0.0831 0.0768 0.2967 0.2743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2011-12 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 27 7 17 24 0.889
2010-11 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 25 2 4 6 0.240
2009-10 New England D3 — FR 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2009-10 · New England
+71.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17930
Defenseman overall
#1583
Defenseman born in 1988
#1456
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Clay Cross
Marian · 2015-16
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunn
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel McNamara
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.