IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Lun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 55 5 5 10 0.182 0.0394 0.0390 0.1407 0.1394
2006-07 Brockville Braves CCHL 53 4 7 11 0.207 0.0450 0.0424 0.1606 0.1512
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 — SR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 — JR 1 0 1 1 1.000
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 — SO 27 1 9 10 0.370
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 — FR 27 6 5 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2007-08 · UMass Boston
+1060.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54604
Forward overall
#1759
Forward born in 1986
#1819
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Monfils
Marian · 2014-15
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Burton
Marian · 2008-09
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Eldridge
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.