IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bill Foster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Capital District Selects EJHL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0468 0.0476 — —
2006-07 Seguin Bruins OJHL 49 9 6 15 0.306 0.0750 0.0715 0.2095 0.1997
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 38 8 9 17 0.447 0.0970 0.0887 0.3463 0.3166
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2009-10 Neumann D3 — SO 26 3 5 8 0.308
2008-09 Neumann D3 — FR 29 4 3 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2008-09 · Neumann
+244.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39484
Forward overall
#1283
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lance Malark
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Coykendall
Adrian · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.