IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Crabtree Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0482 0.0503 0.1255 0.1311
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 41 7 14 21 0.512 0.1099 0.1046 0.2508 0.2388
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 — SR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2016-17 Canton D3 — JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2015-16 Canton D3 — SO 25 1 2 3 0.120
2014-15 Canton D3 — FR 24 2 5 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2014-15 · Canton
+311.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42115
Forward overall
#1690
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Landon Cole
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ari Lifschutz
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Watt
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.