← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Benák Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-10 Country: Czechia
2025 · Round 4, Pick #102  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USHL-Style-Czech 30 10 21 31 1.033 0.3191 0.3621 1.1036 1.2524
2023-24 USHL-Style-Czech 29 8 21 29 1.000 0.3088 0.3378 1.0680 1.1684
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 17 42 59 1.054 0.6215 0.6504 3.1644 3.3115
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 48 28 49 77 1.604 0.9280 0.9236 4.1220 4.1022
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3032
Forward overall
#11
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.